Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Linch-Pin


Now I know you all have been waiting with baited breath for my much publicized return to Bloggerdom,(okay stop rolling your eyes in disgust)So here I am.(master of the obvious here.)

ahem
hmmmhmmm
aaahhhhhheeeeemmmmmm(
sorry got a bit of a cold:)

Now in the picture above you see a picture of the Mediterranean World,the outlined areas are the 750 A.D borders of the Umayyad Caliphate.The Umayyad Caliphate was the fourth reincarnation of the Arabian Empire,started by Muhammad's jihads in 622 A.D.The Caliphate was by far the strongest country in the world at that time;doubly larger than the Byzantines,and four times larger than the Frankish Empire.But size was not the only way this country was stronger than others,it had a centralized government when others were falling into feudalism,it still had many of the scientific methods lost in the Dark Ages,but perhaps the greatest of all it was united in religion and drive while the countries of Europe were wracked by the Catholic/Orthodox/Arianism debacle and rampant anarchy.The Umayyad royal family could indeed boast of much,especially having weathered civil disturbance early in their reign.The Umayyad Caliphs were on a march to world domination,with only the wily-Byzantines and the newly born Frankish Empire to stop them.But like all Muslim rulers,their key to victory was also their weakness,Islam.The ability of generations of Muslim rulers to be able to throw hordes of unrelenting,non-stop,zealots(with heaven assured to those who died) against the "infidels" was one of the main reasons for their success.Unfortunately for the Caliphs it was a two edged sword.The Caliphs soon found that the beast of war fueled with Islamic furor is hard to stop.Unable to halt their armies of zealots,they decided to turn them on the final strongholds of resistance between them and the sundered,easy-target of Europe.
The Arabian invaders attacked the Byzantines first,hoping for the final destruction of their long hated enemies.Gaining a handful of victories in the beginning, the Caliphate was forced to back down due to a major loss at the Battle of Akrionon.(From then on the Arabians would never again move past that point in their invasion of Asia minor.That was completed by the Turks.)
With the failure of the Eastern invasion the Umayyad family lost quite a bit of prestige,the only way to keep their positions(and heads)was to declare an attack up the Iberian peninsula into the Franks.
The wide fields of Gaul(lower west France)and Burgundy(lower east France)were raided and attacked by the Arabs,but in order to take and hold that area the Caliphate needed to own Tours a linch-pin city keeping the Frankish border from reduction.It was here that the Charles Martel(Mayor of the Palace,de facto King of the Franks)decided to stop the Muslim advance.Now take a minute to view the stakes,here is the literal last line of defense for the European Christendom,a loss would give the Arabs dominance in all of western Europe and establishing a caliphate which undoubtedly would have solidified and crushed any and all resistance.
The Battle of Tours is one of the rare victories of Medieval Europe.The tactical genius of Charles Martel probably had the most to do with it.He prepared his infantry and chose the perfect place for the battle to negate his opponents better size and maneuverability.
When the Arabians came they met a unexpectedly stiff Resistance.The commander of the Muslim soldiers panicked and ordered a siege in put in place.This was exactly what the Frankish commander needed for in the few days the Caliphate troops needed to get situated,the literal Frankish Calvary arrived from the out flung areas of the kingdom.Veterans all, these troops were the elite of the Frankish army.With these troops with him,Charles Martel faked weakness.The Arabian commander falling for the trap ran right into the Frankish core of hardened elites while the bulk of the Frankish army swung around and decimated the enemy forces.
phew
And that is how Western Christendom was saved.I would be glad for any comments.:)

Saturday, January 1, 2011

First Post of The New Year!!!!!!

Here you can post all the things you are thankful for this past year!! (Like this blog)

Friday, December 24, 2010

Merry Christmas!Folks!

Have yourselves a merry little Christmas!To all the Metis regulars have happy holidays and a very merry Christmas.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

The some of the basics of sword fighing

The order of (put cool name here)’s lectures on becoming the fight.
By (put impressive title here ) Rennuke.
Although this is done predominantly with western swords I think most of the  information given here could be used with eastern swords.
I ‘am going to start with the basic basics 

 Ahem…..

 #1


This is a sword.:)
Now before we discus how to use it,lets talk about grip.This may seem trivial and if you do it right it is. But if you do it wrong then it becomes a big problem. Notice in the picture below the swordsman has his thumb over his pointer. This feels natural to some people but it leaves your grip weak in one direction. You might say that you plan on fighting two handed which would cancel this out, but that gives you a disadvantage that we will talk about later. #2
 #3

This is the proper way to gab the hilt (slightly exaggerated for the camera) I don’t know why but where as with the first grip you can literally have the sword knocked out of your hand, with the second (short of a trick) you will probably have your guard hit aside before you lose you grip. Now we have the question WHERE do you grab it.#4

 The closer to the pummel you grab it the more reach and leverage you have but you scarifies maneuverability unless you are strong enough then you don’t lose that but you sword is still five inches longer then the guy In #3 sometimes that’s a good thing and sometimes that is a bad thing.
#5



Short of actually grabbing the blade( which some people have been known to do, albeit as part of a two handed hold)  this hold gives you the most maneuverability of any one handed hold. (observe that this hold is not possible with a katana. Which exchanges the flexibility and extra weapons the cross guard provides in exchange for more protection, though it does get some of that back with its longer handle.)
#6 

                                                                                 
#7

Now in this next picture I have tried to illustrate that disadvantage I mentioned earlier. When using both hands your left-hand shortens your right hands reach and vice versa so if your opponent is using one hand he can force you to move your hole  body to block his attack and one hand holds can move and twist in ways that both hands just can’t.
#8

Some people have tried to remedy this with holds like this one.
#9

This gives you the strength of two handed holds and the some of the maneuverability of single hand holds. But at the same time shifts your effective area.  In picture #10 the black line represents the effective operational section of holds like the one in #10 and the blue one shows it for the one used in #9.
#10

On a side note left handed swordsmen have an advantage on right handed ones because there are so many more right handed people then there are left handed so both right and left handed swordsmen are used to fighting the right hand but left hander’s  moves are the opposite. Now let’s look  at some basic moves.
Let’s start with some of the guard positions.
#11

#11 shows what is called the plow guard this is a balanced good all around stance. Its central location allows you to have lower response time and boasts strong blocks which is useful especially if you are fighting an opponent that you are unsure of  while at the same time offers a good position for thrusts. This stance is your tried and true, your rock strategists, good for new swordsmen and more experience ones in difficult situations. It’s weakness, if there is one, is that it doesn’t lend itself well to anything fancy or psychological  tricks, at least not my type.
#12

This Is the floor guard from knights and men-at-arms to the  samurai this guard has seen a lot of use.  An excellent one for fights with opponents who like to go for the legs or are just shorter than you. It also puts you in a good thrusting position  but is weak against head blows and  if your opponent is very close to you. Quite hard to use successfully when running .
#13 

The high guard as #13 is called. Almost the mirror  of the floor guard its characteristics  include: a good upper body defense, very strong downward cuts, and is fairly easy to use while running.  It also permits some of the more complicated moves that the guards I’ve already mentioned don’t. As far as weaknesses go  it’s lower body defense is mediocre and it is fairly hard to thrust from. (Good position to execute a surprise attack with you pommel.)
#14

This is the roof guard, it sacrifices the powerful downward blows of the high guard for better lower defense and gives you a good thrusting or draw cut position but makes it hard to do a standard cut.
#15

I’m still trying to figure out whether this is called the fool’s guard because when you use it you are trying to get your adversary to think you’re a fool ,you are trying to make him a fool or because you are a fool. The idea is that it makes you look like you’re leaving yourself wide open for attack. The problem is, you are. Theoretically it gives you a very strong swing so you can cover ground  very quickly, and knock you enemies blow aside hopefully leaving him unguarded and or over extended. Of course if his is fast, or strong, or smart enough then he just kills you. And so much for your fancy maneuver.
Well, it sounds good on paper ,and learning moves, guards and their uses is beneficial,even necessary ,but there is no substitute (in my humble opinion) for getting out there and having the daylights beaten out of you. Of knowing the thrill of victory and the taste of defeat. Feeling the fear of KNOWING that unless you do something different NOW you are going to loose…..again. Knowing the power and responsibility of having a well balanced blade in your hands…. and knowing how to use it.
But remember something ,the sword is just a supplement to your body’s arsenal and your body is just the medium through which your mind and heart Fight. 

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

To catch us up

I’m sorry but my article on eastern swords suffered the fate of “experiencing  technical difficulties” Indefinitely If any of you would like to read it I would be glad to get you a hard copy.
In other news I was thinking that since we have a new interest in sword fitting Gryphon could do something on the art of drawing and I could do one on some practical sword fighting.
Input please.