This Work is Dedicated
By a Humble Native of Flatland
In the Hope that
Even as he was Initiated into the Mysteries
Of THREE Dimensions
Having been previously conversant
With ONLY TWO
So the Citizens of that Celestial Region
May aspire yet higher and higher
To the Secrets of FOUR FIVE OR EVEN SIX Dimensions
Thereby contributing
To the Enlargement of THE IMAGINATION
And the possible Development
Of that most rare and excellent Gift of MODESTY
Among the Superior Races
Of SOLID HUMANITY
There are few books that provide a universal
application like Flatlands: A Romance of
Many Dimensions. Written by Edward Abbot in 1884, this novel not only acts
as an allegory of the social conditions in Victorian England but also gives a
principle that can be applied to almost any discipline. Reading this novel
gives a glimpse into the idea that assumptions are only as valid as the
information that they are formed upon.
Flatlands begins with an in depth
explanation into the 2-dimensional world where the narrator, A. Square, exists.
The denizens of this plane are geometric figures with length and width but without
height, and everything appears as a straight flat line to them. They must
distinguish themselves and objects through the number of angles that something
has, which they ascertain through either feeling the angles or through the “art
of seeing”. These arts are important to the Flatlanders because too sharp an
angle can kill them.
This leads to the explanation of their social
system. Male Flatlanders are divided into the four classes which are dictated
by the amount and degree of angles a figure has. The most numerous figures are
the isosceles triangles that form up the soldier and laborer class. Next highest
are the equilateral triangles which represent the middle class and tradesman.
The gentleman class is comprised of squares and pentagons. Hexagons form the
nobility class. Finally, once a figure has so many angles of small degree that
it is nearly indistinguishable from a circle, it joins the ranks of the
priestly class, who rule over every aspect of Flatland. This is not an absolute
static system. There is a natural law in Flatland that every generation should
have one more angle than the previous generation. While this is not always the
case, the law does allow a method of social mobility. Although this mobility
does not apply to females, they are not figures but appear as straight lines. Because
it is a hazard for a figure to be of irregular size and shape, any person that
has a misshapen angle is put into a penal institution, and it can impede the
aforementioned natural law.
At this
juncture, the author explains more about the circles and the events surrounding
their dominion. The higher up a figure went in the social ladder the faster that
figure’s successive generation would gain angles, but this advantage has a parallel
handicap. The more angles a figure has the less fertile it is, and the harder
it is to create non-irregular offspring. This fact makes the ruling circles, which
we are told have monopolized power based on “perfect configuration of angles”,
conservative in the extreme. They fear revolts and the disappearance of their mandate,
and this is the context for the main part of the novel.
Part two of
this novel is about the enlightening adventure of the narrator. He is living
through the passing of a new millennium in Flatland, and he has a vision that takes
him to a realm of 1-dimension, length. Called Lineland, the Square observes,
through interaction with the king of Lineland, that the inhabitants of this
plane are completely unaware of other dimensions, and they are unwilling to
even consider the possibility. A. Square tries many ways to convince the king
of a second dimension but ultimately fails, is shouted down by the inhabitants,
and wakes to his own home.
Further on
during that night, the square meets a sphere which is likewise visiting him as
he visited Lineland. Just as A. Square attempted to enlighten the King about a
second dimension, the sphere tries to explain a third dimension. This is
ultimately just as fruitless, and the sphere is forced to pull the square out
of his 2-D existence into a 3-D plane called Spaceland.
In this
plane, our narrator is shown the “wonders” of Spaceland. He also observes
Flatland in its 2-D state from a 3-D perspective. This has the effect of
creating an insatiable curiosity on the part of A. Square. He pushes his guide
for a 4th and 5th dimension, exasperating the sphere to
the point where he returns him to Flatland. This does not last long as our
narrator is again given a vision by the sphere to another new plane, the plane
of 0-D. This plane is contained within one point and one Solipsistic
inhabitant. This inhabitant can conceive no other being, existence, change, or
movement. In fact, the very intervention of the Square is taken by the Point as
a manifestation of his own mind.
At this
point, one should begin to grasp the universal application of this novel. In
any profession, relationship, or science that humanity has, there are assumptions
and biases that have developed about the way things are done. These provide
foundational tradition on the methods employed in those areas. But, it is
important, imperative, to realize that these assumptions are based upon the
observable knowledge present, and thus that premise is limited to that same
observable knowledge. One can draw a parallel in this respect to these
assumptions and the dimensional planes of this novel. Each indigenous life form
of the respective lands drew their view from the knowledge that was available to
them at that point, and the incorporation of these “extra dimensions” was
incomprehensible to them until the proper observation of it was able to be found.
If this idea is applied to historical examples, there are numerous references
to be drawn.
The
development of science is just one such reference. Until the Copernican
Revolution, it was widely considered that the universe was arrayed in a
geocentric model. This was postulated with the observable data at hand, thus it
was valid but still wrong. The discovery of the heliocentric universe was one
instance where the “plane” of astronomy was lifted upwards to a better
understanding. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek opened a similar transition when he
unveiled the cellular construction and biology. This opened the door to a whole
new understanding of biology.
Science is
not the only area where this thought can be applied. Business and economics
also reflect this pattern. The understanding of the way money and production flow
has moved from different “dimensions” of understanding across history. While
there are many different views on this subject, that doesn’t invalidate the
idea the perspective on the subject has changed considerably.
In addition, it
is worth noting that when this understanding is reached it doesn’t mean that
all previous information is thrown away. Many times the facts we know are part
of the larger truth.
This is
relevant, not only to the study of historical transitions, but also to modern individuals’
lives. If one analyzes the assumptions he holds, there is every chance that he
may realize his own limitations. Through this realization, one can to look
beyond this limitation for a solution to his own limited observable data.
Flatlands
can teach SUNY Fredonia students this universal principle of challenging assumptions
to find the truth. It could be promoted through the series of special
objectives for students in individual departments to find new ways of looking
at problems and developing abilities. To motivate students for reading the book
and achieving this goal, each department would provide a challenge for their
majors. The winner would be the student(s) who were able to create the most
creative solution to the problem. Winners would have this count towards their cumulative
GPA, and would be given an award.
While many
books attempt to inspire the reader towards creativity, I haven’t read one that
could do it better than Flatlands. This novel, while entertaining, shows a
greater moral of expanding one’s understanding towards truth.
Well It did take me a bit longer to comment I really did like you post its vary thought provoking one could even say challenging. there are lots of spiritual analogies to draw from it to.
ReplyDelete@8108ebcfc64c5b47bdfb4ff7b84dff8b:disqus :Thank you for commenting, and it is okay if it bores you. The book is actually quite good, but I am trying to pull a purposefully complicated thing. Thank you for the prayers. (I appreciate anything I can get :) As of now, I haven't been corrupted, but that is why I have friends in case I need an "intervention".
ReplyDelete@18da086f8f9670b44083b05eee2477dd:disqus : Yeah, I was trying to point to the fact that "science's" assumptions are based simply on what we can observe. We can not observe the spiritual, so our "scientific world views" can not apply to the spiritual. But there are others too.